Les autres articles
Rencontre
Bénédicte Liard & Pascal Picolillo : photographes
A GIORNO : Passion Photo
A GIORNO : Passion Mariages…
Fondateurs de « A Giorno », passionnés de photographie et couple à la ville comme derrière l'objectif, Bénédicte Liard et Pascal Picolillo ne se quittent plus depuis treize ans. Une complémentarité et un amour commun de l'image qui, outre deux petits garçons, a donné naissance à de magnifiques et très atypiques photos de mariage aux mises en scènes toujours très pointues et décalées.
Pascal a toujours baigné dans le milieu de la photo : son père a eu un magasin de photo et son frère est photographe. Bénédicte a décidé de devenir photographe lorsqu'à 14 ans on lui a donné un vieil appareil.
Ils se sont rencontrés en 1999 chez leur maître d'apprentissage à Montpellier (diplôme de photographie obtenu en 2001) et depuis 12 ans maintenant ils vivent et travaillent ensemble. Ils sont parents de deux enfants, Noah et Ben, leurs deux garçons, qu'ils ne cessent de photographier.
Pascal c'est le boss, celui sans qui "A Giorno" n'existerait pas. Il est prudent, réfléchi, toujours soucieux, et s'occupe de faire tourner la boîte. Il a le côté technique de la photo et sa sensibilité lui permet de réaliser de belles images. Bénédicte vit dans les nuages, elle pense et organise les prises de vues. Passionnée par la retouche d'images et toujours en quête de nouvelles tendances.
« Nous cherchons ensemble à changer la photo de mariage, nous mêlons le trash au glamour, le classique au rock and roll, cherchant toujours à sortir des sentiers battus. »
Leurs endroits de prédilection pour réaliser leurs photos sont en général hors du commun : un chantier, un dépôt, une rue de zone artisanale, des champs en friche.
La photo de mariage est le domaine dans lequel ils s'épanouissent le plus. Que ce soit le reportage ou les photos de couple, ils passent de merveilleux moments avec les mariés. C'est leur passion, et en plus ce ne sont que des moments heureux...
Aujourd'hui ils créent le site "bisni" qui s'appellera www.bisni-world.com et qui regroupera l'ensemble de leurs créations. Des faire-part personnalisés, en allant du plan de table à la carte de remerciements.
Passion photos, passion mariages, papeterie personnalisée et encore plein de projets…
Bénédicte et Pascal, l'amour instantané !
contact@a-giorno.com
www.a-giorno.com
Réagissez !
Vos impressions Fanny le 12.01.12 18:05:37
Un vrai talent. De véritables artistes. MERCI
Anonyme le 02.05.12 22:59:59
In Morfik AppsBuilder, all binary code geoiartenn (that is to say all server side code) is done through the FreePascal compiler. This means that regardless of which language you write the code in, the server side compiler will generate pascal code which is then processed by the FreePascal compiler to generate the final binary.The current BX edition does this for the Morfik Basic language and the upcoming C# edition will do the same for the C# language. One difference between Morfik's approach and what was done with C++ Builder is that ALL of the framework is translated into the language of the edition you are using. Morfik BX has all its framework source code in Basic and the same will be true for the C# edition. This means that you will be able to write your components in any language. As a side effect it also means that your components will only work in that particular edition, making it difficult for component writers to easily distribute the components for wider audience. In a way, if you are expecting to get a version of Morfik that used a C# compiler for backend (final binary) geoiartenn, you are helping me make my case. That is not what a C# edition will be and that is the reason I feel that people might be disapointed in their expectations.Now, if it were called M#, for example, you might be happy to have a language that is similar to C# and therefore familiar to you and would not be disapointed because it turns out that it does not use a backend C# compiler.
Anonyme le 03.05.12 05:41:41
cR2weL avtglfroizgm
Anonyme le 13.05.12 05:21:55
I whole heartedly agree with you about “the ‘I’ in IDE is for Integrated”, I’ve tried many IDE (listed below) but found them all inferior, in some annoying way, to JBuilder, which makes most stuff fluid and easy to do, even some hard stuff, you really see the attention good GUI designers, despite some flaws in Swing.JDeveloper (has run profiles, but no IDE import filters, seems feature bare)IDEA 5 (lacks run profiles, build nodes (not ANT), it has JBuilder project import which annoyingly misses too much to be useful for my projects (support didn’t get it when contacted), seems less easy to use, not enough source control choice, but not as bad as other IDEs), I can see why it costs less than JBuilder, but only a little and too expensive for what you get.Java Beans 5 (lacks too much from JBuilder, not enough useful and free plugins, but looks better than eclipse and has some great sounding features, not as good as IDEA though).Eclipse (sorry, but it is an unintegrated mess, better than it was yes, but counter intuitive, too much need for plugins which should be intergrated functionality. I also hate the idea of sub-standard Swing support and having to use SWT for extensions, IMHO SWT is just wrong.
eastwood auto insurance cheap california auto insurance
gefmfppkage le 21.05.12 19:27:11
MPoPuo hqcnkeagcnlq, [url=http://lbtffpkwiles.com/]lbtffpkwiles[/url], [link=http://lkautgtoknsf.com/]lkautgtoknsf[/link], http://zymmmorizpcg.com/
Fzhentck le 22.05.12 08:39:01
penis enlargment pill penis enlargment pill
Cmgtwvbh le 23.05.12 17:49:01
rezeptfrei potenzmittel rezeptfrei potenzmittel
Dqytdvta le 23.05.12 20:09:48
viagra pas cher viagra pas cher
Mwbjszax le 24.05.12 14:17:06
payday loans canada cash payday loans canada cash
Xnqdyvpn le 24.05.12 22:30:33
laptoprepair.wallst laptoprepair.wallst
Cccvndni le 25.05.12 14:56:06
payday lenders paydayloansukadvance
Irlkagfz le 29.05.12 22:25:08
pyrates http://paydayloansmv.com
rhrmodjqt le 30.05.12 10:27:48
gRJbaO vusaxttngblv, [url=http://jlguuugdgsyk.com/]jlguuugdgsyk[/url], [link=http://ngcafzpcuwdl.com/]ngcafzpcuwdl[/link], http://kjeqpypsyfqh.com/
Anonyme le 31.05.12 05:14:41
Renewing of C# support will be nice. Iâm still waiting for this release.About how programming languages are titled, as far I remember Morfik C# and Morfik Java was used in first release.âI have no idea why Morfik decided to separate the languages in 2.0 and have a separate edition for each language, but I imagine the reason they left C# and Java out was that these languages had drawn much less interest than Pascal and Basic and their compilers were not up to the level of the Pascal and Basic ones.âI think that not any C# compiler was included in 1.x version. All C# and Java coded sources was translated to pascal code at beginning and free pascal compiler was used for this goal.Separating of versions is related a little more to the market strategy by my opinion and maybe to the new component pattern.Using of only one programming language in framework and user defined code is clearer like conception in addition.The same bored task for me like C++ programmer with C++Builder was to read their VCL pascal code. Sometimes I was forced to translate any useful VCL code parts to C++. There were many disadvantages in component writing and using by this reason.I hope that Morfik component conception will allow using and writing of not only pascal coded components.
car insureance eastwood auto insurance
| Vos impressions |
| Fanny le 12.01.12 18:05:37 |
| Un vrai talent. De véritables artistes. MERCI |
| Anonyme le 02.05.12 22:59:59 |
| In Morfik AppsBuilder, all binary code geoiartenn (that is to say all server side code) is done through the FreePascal compiler. This means that regardless of which language you write the code in, the server side compiler will generate pascal code which is then processed by the FreePascal compiler to generate the final binary.The current BX edition does this for the Morfik Basic language and the upcoming C# edition will do the same for the C# language. One difference between Morfik's approach and what was done with C++ Builder is that ALL of the framework is translated into the language of the edition you are using. Morfik BX has all its framework source code in Basic and the same will be true for the C# edition. This means that you will be able to write your components in any language. As a side effect it also means that your components will only work in that particular edition, making it difficult for component writers to easily distribute the components for wider audience. In a way, if you are expecting to get a version of Morfik that used a C# compiler for backend (final binary) geoiartenn, you are helping me make my case. That is not what a C# edition will be and that is the reason I feel that people might be disapointed in their expectations.Now, if it were called M#, for example, you might be happy to have a language that is similar to C# and therefore familiar to you and would not be disapointed because it turns out that it does not use a backend C# compiler. |
| Anonyme le 03.05.12 05:41:41 |
| cR2weL avtglfroizgm |
| Anonyme le 13.05.12 05:21:55 |
| I whole heartedly agree with you about “the ‘I’ in IDE is for Integrated”, I’ve tried many IDE (listed below) but found them all inferior, in some annoying way, to JBuilder, which makes most stuff fluid and easy to do, even some hard stuff, you really see the attention good GUI designers, despite some flaws in Swing.JDeveloper (has run profiles, but no IDE import filters, seems feature bare)IDEA 5 (lacks run profiles, build nodes (not ANT), it has JBuilder project import which annoyingly misses too much to be useful for my projects (support didn’t get it when contacted), seems less easy to use, not enough source control choice, but not as bad as other IDEs), I can see why it costs less than JBuilder, but only a little and too expensive for what you get.Java Beans 5 (lacks too much from JBuilder, not enough useful and free plugins, but looks better than eclipse and has some great sounding features, not as good as IDEA though).Eclipse (sorry, but it is an unintegrated mess, better than it was yes, but counter intuitive, too much need for plugins which should be intergrated functionality. I also hate the idea of sub-standard Swing support and having to use SWT for extensions, IMHO SWT is just wrong. |
| eastwood auto insurance cheap california auto insurance |
| gefmfppkage le 21.05.12 19:27:11 |
| MPoPuo hqcnkeagcnlq, [url=http://lbtffpkwiles.com/]lbtffpkwiles[/url], [link=http://lkautgtoknsf.com/]lkautgtoknsf[/link], http://zymmmorizpcg.com/ |
| Fzhentck le 22.05.12 08:39:01 |
| penis enlargment pill penis enlargment pill |
| Cmgtwvbh le 23.05.12 17:49:01 |
| rezeptfrei potenzmittel rezeptfrei potenzmittel |
| Dqytdvta le 23.05.12 20:09:48 |
| viagra pas cher viagra pas cher |
| Mwbjszax le 24.05.12 14:17:06 |
| payday loans canada cash payday loans canada cash |
| Xnqdyvpn le 24.05.12 22:30:33 |
| laptoprepair.wallst laptoprepair.wallst |
| Cccvndni le 25.05.12 14:56:06 |
| payday lenders paydayloansukadvance |
| Irlkagfz le 29.05.12 22:25:08 |
| pyrates http://paydayloansmv.com |
| rhrmodjqt le 30.05.12 10:27:48 |
| gRJbaO vusaxttngblv, [url=http://jlguuugdgsyk.com/]jlguuugdgsyk[/url], [link=http://ngcafzpcuwdl.com/]ngcafzpcuwdl[/link], http://kjeqpypsyfqh.com/ |
| Anonyme le 31.05.12 05:14:41 |
| Renewing of C# support will be nice. Iâm still waiting for this release.About how programming languages are titled, as far I remember Morfik C# and Morfik Java was used in first release.âI have no idea why Morfik decided to separate the languages in 2.0 and have a separate edition for each language, but I imagine the reason they left C# and Java out was that these languages had drawn much less interest than Pascal and Basic and their compilers were not up to the level of the Pascal and Basic ones.âI think that not any C# compiler was included in 1.x version. All C# and Java coded sources was translated to pascal code at beginning and free pascal compiler was used for this goal.Separating of versions is related a little more to the market strategy by my opinion and maybe to the new component pattern.Using of only one programming language in framework and user defined code is clearer like conception in addition.The same bored task for me like C++ programmer with C++Builder was to read their VCL pascal code. Sometimes I was forced to translate any useful VCL code parts to C++. There were many disadvantages in component writing and using by this reason.I hope that Morfik component conception will allow using and writing of not only pascal coded components. |
| car insureance eastwood auto insurance |
Retrouvez nous tous les deux mois chez votre commerçant préféré.
N'hésitez pas à nous écrire : contact@decoresens-mag.fr